Benefits Administration Corp. v. Rearick
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLEIL, Justice.
Benefits Administration Corporation appeals from a summary judgment denying it any recovery in its suit for breach of contract against Philip Rearick. It raises an issue concerning the enforceability of a written contract between the parties to share commissions earned by Rearick, a licensed insurance agent, for sales of United Fidelity Life Insurance Company insurance policies. We conclude that the agreement is unenforceable because it violates the Texas Insurance Code, and affirm the trial court’s judgment that BAC take nothing by virtue of its suit.
In his answer, Philip…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Armstrong v. Tidelands Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Van Perkins v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Tidelands Life Insurance Company v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Ahmed v. Shimi Ventures, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Solomon v. Greenblatt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Danny L. Ferch//Cross-Appellant, William Baschnagel v. William Baschnagel and the Insurance Network//Cross-Appellee, Danny L. Ferch, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Danny L. Ferch//Cross-Appellant, William Baschnagel v. William Baschnagel and the Insurance Network//Cross-Appellee, Danny L. Ferch, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.