Legal Opinion

Milcherska v. Hoerstman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2016No. 71A03-1509-JP-1640PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case Summary

BRADFORD, Judge.

[1] Appellant-Petitioner Christine Mil-cherska (“Mother”) and Appellee-Respon-dent James Hoerstman (“Father”) have had shared custody of their child, A.H., since the child’s birth in 2004. In 2015, Mother accepted a new job in Texas- and filed a notice of intent to relocate with the child. Father objected to Mother’s motion and petitioned for a modification of custody so the child could remain in Indiana with him throughout the- school year. After three evidentiary hearings, the probate court denied Mother’s request to relocate and granted Father primary physical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baxendale v. RaichIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. D.C. v. J.A.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Periquet-Febres v. FebresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Paternity of W.R.H. Casie N. Wheeler v. William Jesse HinshawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Bobbie Sales (f/k/a Bobbie Herron) v. Richard Allen Moulder, Jr. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. James Irwin Richter v. Neha Bhatnagar RichterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API