Legal Opinion

In re Macay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

MotioN in the cause heard at August Special Term, 1880, of RowaN Superior Court, before McKoy, J. There was judgment for petitioners, from which the Beards appealed. See preceding case.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The present proceeding commenced by motion in the cause, like that in theMerony case at the present term, seeks to subject to the payment of the purchase money another tract bought at the same sale by one Margaretta L. Beard from the clerk and master, Luke Blackmer, and for which she executed her bond payable to him as guardian of Anna Macay. During the progress of the cause the said Anna who had intermarried with Stephen F. Lord, a co-plaintiff, died intestate and her said husband (who administered on her estate) and her heirs at law were made par*65'■ties plaintiff. The said Margaretta also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mebane v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Tabor v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Lord v. . BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Whitehurst v. . Gaskill and AnotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Boykin v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julian v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
  2. Cannon v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Meroney v. . AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API