Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2002No. 98C-15881; A108801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The state appeals from a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner on the grounds that his trial and appellate counsel were inadequate. We reverse.

Petitioner was charged with assault in the first degree and criminal mischief in the second degree arising out of his hitting the victim on the head with a metal pipe. The case was tried to the court. At the conclusion of the state’s case-in-chief, petitioner moved for a judgment of acquittal on the assault charge, asserting that the state had failed to establish that petitioner’s conduct had caused serious physical injury to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Drown v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Hagel v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. O'Hara v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Lambert v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API