Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Dyer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1965No. 41558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. (a) Where the grantor, or his privy, in a security deed remains in possession of the premises after lawful foreclosure of the deed, he is a tenant at sufferance and is subject to be summarily dispossessed by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, or by his privy. Price v. Bloodworth, 55 Ga. App. 268 (189 SE 925).(b) Where the person in possession is a son of the deceased grantor in the security deed, whether claiming as an heir at law or as a devisee under the grantor’s will, he is subject to summary dispossession to the same extent and in the same manner as would have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. BloodworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turpin v. North American Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Hyman v. LeathersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Remy v. Citicorp Person-to-Person Financial Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Collins v. Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Partin v. SOUTHERN DISCOUNT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API