Legal Opinion

Beere v. Mayer

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtScotchman, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants on December 8, 1892, made a certain indemnity bond to the plaintiff, as follows: “ Whereas, Mrs. Bernard Beere claims that she may be or become liable to Charles Wyndham in the sum of $25 a performance for fifty (50) performances of the play entitled ‘ The Fringe of Society,’ to be given in a tour in America during the season of 1892 and 1893, on a paper writing of which the annexed is a copy. And Whereas, as a condition for the cancellation of an agreement between Marcus R. Mayer and the said Mrs. Beere, she requires that she be indemnified and held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bridgeport Fire & Marine Insurance v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Hutchinson v. RootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Bernard-Beere v. MayerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API