Legal Opinion

Hill v. Giuliani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 24, 1997, which, to the extent appealed as limited by plaintiffs’ brief, denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a claim under General Municipal Law § 51, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A taxpayer action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 51 against a public official does not lie unless the official conduct complained of, in addition to being illegal, involves fraud, collusion, or personal gain (see, Duffy v Longo, 207 AD2d 860, 865, appeal dismissed 86 NY2d 779; Beresford Apts.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duffy v. LongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Beresford Apartments, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Rachmani Corp. v. 19th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dos Santos v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Dos Santos v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API