Legal Opinion

Klose v. Mende

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 2001No. 3—01—0098PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE

Jerome and Ruth Klose (plaintiffs) filed an amended complaint for declaratory judgment (complaint) against Frederick E. Mende (defendant), seeking a court order that would establish plaintiffs’ fee simple title in two roadways. The trial court found that the Meriden Township road district held valid dedications for the two roads and dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs then moved for leave to file a second amended complaint, which the court denied. Plaintiffs now appeal from the dismissal of their claim.

FACTS

On October 6, 1995, plaintiffs recorded a warranty deed (deed) in the La Salle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Bloomfield Club Recreation Ass'n v. Hoffman Group Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. First Fed. Sav. Bank of Proviso Township v. Drovers Nat. BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Schultz v. KantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Rodgers v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tower v. PitstickIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Klose v. MendeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Klose v. MendeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Klose v. MendeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API