Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-36256PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
We consider whether review of certain timber sales is available under the Administrative Procedure Act.
I
Plaintiffs Oregon Natural Resources Council and Umpqua Watersheds, Inc. are environmental organizations trying to block four sales of timber by defendant Jack Ward Thomas, Chief of the United States Forest Service.1 Plaintiffs’ challenge to two of the sales, Watchdog and Roughneck, has effectively been resolved against them by our recent decision in Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Glickman, 82 F.Bd 825…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Save Our Springs v. BabbittDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
- Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. United States Forest Service, and Intermountain Forest Industry Association, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lake Mohave Boat Owners Association v. National Park Service Alan O'Neill Stanley T. Albright Seven Resorts Inc. Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.