Legal Opinion

Highfill v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1948No. 33196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

Plaintiff Friedman, holder of a resale tax deed covering lots in the city of Pawhuska, filed this action against defendant Highfill and others, to quiet his title and for possession of the property. Defendant High-fill, purchaser of the property from the former owner, by answer alleged that the tax deed was void; that the resale was advertised for an amount of taxes in excess of the amount due, and that no legal notice was given thereof. At the trial the trial court required High-fill, as the owner of the property, to tender and pay into court all taxes, penalties, interest and costs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Evans v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Egan v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. G. A. Nichols, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parks v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Chapman v. CalhounSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API