Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. William H. Parks. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcOLELLAN, J.
—
The defendant having appealed from the justice’s ■ court to the criminal court of Pike county, the cause was in the latter court for trial de novo, without regard to any inaccuracies or imperfections in the proceedings before the justice.—Tatum v. The State, 66 Ala. 465; Blankenshire v. The State, 70 Ala. 10; Code §§ 4224, 4243; Acts 1888-9, pp. 631, et seg., §§ 2, 3, 12. The motion of defendant to dismiss the appeal, &c., and his plea in abatement, each of which were based on alleged inaccuracies and imperfections in the proceedings before the justice, were, therefore, without merit.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Blankenshire v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Dothan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Turner v. Town of LinevilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- Brooks v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Edmunds v. State, ex rel. DedgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920