Legal Opinion

Medi-Fi Two Inc. v. Riordan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1979No. 78-1016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

The issue presented to us for review is whether plaintiff Medi-Fi Two Incorporated sustained its burden of proof in a contract action against defendant Dr. Patrick Riordan who allegedly breached an agreement between the parties.

The cause was tried before the court without a jury upon the complaint and a counterclaim resulting in judgment for defendantcounterplaintiff on the complaint and for plaintiff-counterdefendant on the counterclaim on September 28,1977. Plaintiff filed a post-trial motion on October 4, 1977, which was denied on April 19, 1978.

By amended notice of appeal of May 17,1978,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Broberg v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Fleshner v. CopelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Consoer, Townsend & Associates v. AddisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Hall v. Humphrey-Lake Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API