Legal Opinion

Gray v. Trimmaster

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2005No. 2004-SC-1027-WCPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

In defining the term “injury,” KRS 342.0011(1) requires that a work-related harmful change in the human organism must be “evidenced by objective medical findings.” Despite acknowledging that the employer failed to file a timely Form 111, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed the claimant’s application for benefits after determining that there were no objective medical findings of a harmful change in the human organism and, therefore, no compensable injury. Gibbs v. Premier Scale Company/Indiana Scale Company, 50 S.W.3d 754 (Ky.2001). Although the claimant maintained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  3. Snawder v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. Roark v. Alva Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  5. Gibbs v. Premier Scale Company/Indiana Scale Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. American Woodmark Corp. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  2. Barbara Smith v. Bledsoe Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Bill Huntsman Sr D/B/A Huntsman & Sons Painting v. Joe ManningKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Bill Huntsman Sr D/B/A Huntsman & Sons Painting v. Joe ManningKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Boone Development, LLC v. Nicholasville Board of AdjustmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2024

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API