Gray v. Trimmaster
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
In defining the term “injury,” KRS 342.0011(1) requires that a work-related harmful change in the human organism must be “evidenced by objective medical findings.” Despite acknowledging that the employer failed to file a timely Form 111, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissed the claimant’s application for benefits after determining that there were no objective medical findings of a harmful change in the human organism and, therefore, no compensable injury. Gibbs v. Premier Scale Company/Indiana Scale Company, 50 S.W.3d 754 (Ky.2001). Although the claimant maintained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Snawder v. SticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- Roark v. Alva Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Gibbs v. Premier Scale Company/Indiana Scale Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Woodmark Corp. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Barbara Smith v. Bledsoe Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2020
- Bill Huntsman Sr D/B/A Huntsman & Sons Painting v. Joe ManningKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Bill Huntsman Sr D/B/A Huntsman & Sons Painting v. Joe ManningKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Boone Development, LLC v. Nicholasville Board of AdjustmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2024
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.