Legal Opinion

McLean v. Charles Wright Medicine Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in. the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

O.ne Allington was the owner of 555 shares of the capital stock of the defendant conqpany. In May, 1891, he duly assigned the certificate and the shares of stock mentioned therein to plaintiff. The assignment was on a printed blank upon the back of the certificate, and authorized the assignee to make the necessary transfer on ‘ the books of the company. Plaintiff at once applied to Charles Wright, the president of the company, to have the transfer made upon the books of the company. The secretary was not then present, and the transfer was not made. Subsequently plaintiff again applied, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mandlebaum v. North American Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Walker v. Detroit Transit Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dooley v. Gladiator Consolidated Gold Mines & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Hine v. Commercial BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Nichol v. NewmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API