Legal Opinion
Ren-Dan Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided January 23, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2659PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
LITTLE, Chief Judge.
Before this court are a motion to remand filed by plaintiffs and a motion to transfer venue or dismiss filed by defendants. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED and this matter is remanded to the Tenth Judicial District Court, Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana." Lacking jurisdiction, we do not rule on the defendants’ motion.
I
This dispute concerns genetically spliced cotton seeds known as NuCOTN 33B and NuCOTN 35B which contain the patented Bollgard™ gene. The purpose of the Bollgard™ gene is to make the NuCOTN plants resistant to bollworms and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Larry Leonhardt, Dan Laursen, and Rick Rodriquez, Rodriquez Farms, Inc. v. Western Sugar Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
- Amundson & Associates Art Studio, Ltd. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Ashworth v. Albers Medical, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
- Peterson v. BASF Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.