Legal Opinion

United States v. Two Hollycrane Slot Machines

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 21, 1955No. Nos. 1648-30 and 1650-30; Misc. Civ. No. 51-69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is a libel for forfeiture of two so-called “Hollycrane Digger-Type Machines,” hereinafter called “diggers,” under the Johnson Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1171-1177. The Johnson Act makes the transportation in interstate commerce of certain defined “gambling devices” illegal. It provides for confiscation of such articles so transported, unless they are being transported into a state “which has enacted a law providing for the exemption of such State from the provisions of this section”. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1172. “Diggers” are included in the definitions, and it is agreed that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PlissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. RiversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. St. Patrick's Catholic Church of Sterling v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. 294 Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. O'NEILL v. Town of NantucketDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
  3. United States v. 46 Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API