Ross v. Crane
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. Action for tbe recovery of specific personal property. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEeed, J.
Tbe property in controversy is a team of horses. Plaintiff purchased the team from Oliver Sealine, and gave his two promissory notes, for one hundred dollars each, for the purchase price, and executed a chattel mortgage' on the team to secure the same. 0. M. Blaine was present at the time of the transaction, and contracted with Sealine for the purchase of the notes and mortgage. He paid one hundred dollars at the time, and one of the notes was then turned over to him. Subsequently, at different times, *376he paid the balance of the amount agreed to be paid for them, and the other note and the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kammeier v. ChauvetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Morton v. WoodsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Shull v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Bayless v. EagerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.