Gerrish v. United States
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORNBY, District Judge.
The applications for certificates of appealability are DENIED.
1. Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), are not applicable to cases that were not on direct appeal when they were decided. By its very terms, Booker states that it is to apply “to all cases on direct review.” — U.S.-, at-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), with no reference to cases on collateral review. There is no reason to treat Blakely any differently. These cases furnish no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Anthony Bola OlopadeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.