Legal Opinion

Lane v. Chantilly Corporation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

John M. Moody purchased the premises known as 640 Broadway at a foreclosure sale. Under the terms of sale signed by the purchaser, the premises were sold “ subject to any state of facts which an accurate survey would show.” The survey made after the sale showed that certain stone piers projected one foot eight inches on Broadway and that the portico extended about two feet six inches on Broadway, These encroachments could be removed at the cost of about $1,500, but their removal would somewhat injure the appearance of the building. There were some other encroachments upon the street of minor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarter v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Veeder v. FondaNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. People v. New York Building-Loan Banking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Endicott Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StotskyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Huntington National Bank v. CorneliusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. 491-499 Seventh Avenue AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API