Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Louisville Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint on note. Before Judge Fish. Sumter superior court. May term, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Chief Justice.

The controlling question in this case is, whether a promissory note is rendered non-negotiable by a stipulation to pay “all costs and ten per cent, on amount for counsel fees, if placed in the hands of an attorney for suit.” There is no prior decision of this court upon the *803question, and the decisions of other courts as to the effect of such stipulations are conflicting. We think the better view, and the one supported by the-weight of authoiv ity, is that such a stipulation does not impair the negotiable character of the paper. Our code defines a promissory note to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Gaar v. Louisville Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  5. Stoneman v. PyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Jones v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Tobler v. Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1978
  4. Green v. SpiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API