Legal Opinion

Lovrien v. Oestrich

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1932No. 41153PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The note sued upon is dated December 1,1916. By its terms it was made payable 30 days after demand. The petition, which was filed October 14, 1930, alleges that demand was made September 12, 1930. Defendant demurred on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

The note by its terms bears interest at six per cent, payable annually. The form is one in common use for both short and long-time loans. There is nothing in the form or nature of the contract represented by the note which would indicate any expectation or understanding that demand was not to be made promptly.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Prescott v. GonserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Reizenstein v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Citizens Bank of Pleasantville v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Dean v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Gregg v. Middle States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Fremon v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API