Legal Opinion
Dryer v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1968No. 4317PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
Appellants, husband and wife, were owners of residential property in the District of Columbia. Their property was insured by appellee under a “Homeowners Policy” which in part protected appellants against loss of or damage to their unscheduled personal property “usual or incidental to the occupancy of the premises as a dwelling,” either at or away from their residence, from various perils including theft and vandalism.
In addition to their residence, appellants owned unimproved property in Virginia, approximately 70 miles from the District of Columbia. Growing on the Virginia…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Adkins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Concordia Lutheran Evangelical Church v. United States Casualty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Tibbils v. Federal Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Anthony Skirlick, as an Individual and as a Representative of a Class v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- INTERN. BROTH., ETC. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978