Vincent v. Landi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
*1566We affirm. As limited by plaintiffs’ complaint, defendant, as the movant for summary judgment, bore the initial burden of establishing, as a matter of law, that he maintained the property in a reasonably safe condition and did not have actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition (see Edick v General Elec. Co., 98 AJD3d 1217, 1218 [2012]; Black v Kohl’s Dept. Stores, Inc., 80 AD3d 958, 961 [2011]). In support of his motion, defendant provided, among other things, the deposition testimony of plaintiffs, as well as his own testimony. Defendant’s testimony that his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Black v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cole v. Roberts-BonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bush v. Mechanicville Warehouse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kearsey v. Vestal Park, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dillenbeck v. ShoveltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Drake v. Sagbolt, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Vincent v. LandiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Roberts v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Dillenbeck v. ShoveltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.