Colarossi v. University of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Hurlbutt, J.P., and Gorski, J. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent. In our view, plaintiff raised issues of fact whether the shooting was foreseeable and whether reasonable measures could have prevented it. “A landowner has a duty to take reasonable precautions to secure its premises if it knows or has reason to know from past experience ‘that there is a likelihood of conduct on the part of third persons . . . which is likely to endanger the safety’ of users of the premises” (Di Ponzio v Riordan, 224 AD2d 139, 142 [1996], affd 89 NY2d 578 [1997]). “To recover damages from an owner of real…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jacqueline S. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Di Ponzio v. RiordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Monell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- McKinnon v. Bell SecurityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Di Ponzio v. RiordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.