Legal Opinion

Dupuis v. Reed

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff is the sheriff of the county of Bristol. The defendants are the three county commissioners of that county. The ostensible object of the bill is to restrain the defendants from trespassing upon and interfering with the plaintiff’s occupation of a dwelling house belonging to the county and located within the yard of the jail and house of correction at New Bedford. It is apparent, however, that the true object of the litigation is to determine whether the sheriff or the county commissioners have the right to control the house in question.

The sheriff contends that the house is in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Larcom v. OlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Bauer v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Harper v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. County Commissioners of Bristol v. Judges of Probate of BristolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Members of the Park Board v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API