Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 1987No. BR-261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that respondent refused to credit his sentence with time previously served, as ordered by the sentencing judge. The allegations of the petition, if true, showed that petitioner is presently under illegal constraint. Therefore, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040, the petition was treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and the state was ordered to show cause why the petition should not be granted. On consideration of the response, we conclude that petitioner’s sentence has expired, and we therefore grant the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Florida Parole Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Searcy v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Quarles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Gibson v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API