Diggs v. Department of Corrections
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that respondent refused to credit his sentence with time previously served, as ordered by the sentencing judge. The allegations of the petition, if true, showed that petitioner is presently under illegal constraint. Therefore, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040, the petition was treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and the state was ordered to show cause why the petition should not be granted. On consideration of the response, we conclude that petitioner’s sentence has expired, and we therefore grant the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Andrews v. Florida Parole Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Searcy v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Quarles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Gibson v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002