Legal Opinion

Furey v. O'Connor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh* District. Action by William M. Purey against John D. O’Connor. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The defendant Has been charged with a liability for the price of a barrel of whisky and a case of bitters delivered to one Ryan at a saloon conducted by the latter under his own name, and the sole ground for the recovery is sought to be afforded by the presence of the defendant’s name upon the liquor tax certificate applicable to the premises. The certificate was evidence of nothing other than the payment of the excise tax, and the fact that the defendant had made an application for it, based upon his statement that he" intended to conduct a liquor business, together with such other statement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Niles v. Martin Mathusa & Hinckel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Lyman v. . KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sabre Jet Room, Inc. v. K & L Distributors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. S. Liebmann's Sons Brewing Co. v. De NicoloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. S. Liebmann's Sons Brewing Co. v. De NicoloNew York Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API