Legal Opinion
City of Huntingburg v. Morgen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 1928No. 12,970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.
This is an action by Peter Morgen against the city of Huntingburg for damages occasioned by reason of the failure of the city to furnish him water in a sufficient quantity and pressure, by reason of which a large number of greenhouse plants and products were damaged and destroyed.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff had for many years been engaged in the business of propagating, growing and selling flowers in the city of Huntingburg, and, for that purpose, owned and maintained nine greenhouses, all under glass, and controlled and heated by a system of steam boilers and pipes, and a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Brinkmeyer v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Coy v. Indianapolis Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- South Eastern Indiana Natural Gas Co. v. IngramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- O'Connell v. Town of Schererville of Lake CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Veolia Water Indianapolis LLC v. National Trust Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.