Legal Opinion
42 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861 in Re: H. Edwin and Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. United States of America v. H. Edwin Schimmels Mary Jo Schimmels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1997No. 95-16937Published
1Opinion of the Court
127 F.3d 875
42 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily
Op. Serv. 7975,
97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861
In Re: H. Edwin and Mary Jo SCHIMMELS, Debtors.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
H. Edwin SCHIMMELS; Mary Jo Schimmels, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-16937.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 17, 1997.
Decided Oct. 14, 1997.
1
Jeffrey A. Clair, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellant.
2
Alan R. Smith, Law Offices of Alan R. Smith, Reno, NV, for defendants-appellees.
3
Appeal from the United States…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.