Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Huschle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant brought replevin for a Hudson Super Six Automobile, No. 7971, on the theory that he was entitled to possession thereof under a chattel mortgage in which he was the mortgagee. The case was tried on pleas of non cepit, non detinet and property in the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee.

Appellant contends that the judgment must be reversed because appellee failed to show that he had any right, title or interest in the car. Appellee insists that even if he failed to make such proof the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbour v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Pease v. DittoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cleaves v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Fullerton v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. FrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. VanAusdall v. McCanonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Greenspahn v. EhrlichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API