Legal Opinion

Nodvin v. Arogeti

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 2004No. S03A1659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

The appellants, Stephen and Neal Nodvin, filed a caveat to the probate of their father’s will on the ground that the will was the product of their father’s monomania. The probate court, however, granted summary judgment to the appellee, James Arogeti, the executor of the will. The appellants now appeal, contending that there were issues of fact regarding monomania that should have been submitted to a jury and that the probate court erred in ruling that a recording of their father’s voice was inadmissible. For the following reasons, we find no merit to these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Ashford v. Van HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. English v. ShiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Boney v. BoneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meadows v. BeamSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. MEADOWS v. BEAMSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API