Nodvin v. Arogeti
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Presiding Justice.
The appellants, Stephen and Neal Nodvin, filed a caveat to the probate of their father’s will on the ground that the will was the product of their father’s monomania. The probate court, however, granted summary judgment to the appellee, James Arogeti, the executor of the will. The appellants now appeal, contending that there were issues of fact regarding monomania that should have been submitted to a jury and that the probate court erred in ruling that a recording of their father’s voice was inadmissible. For the following reasons, we find no merit to these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Ashford v. Van HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- English v. ShiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Boney v. BoneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meadows v. BeamSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- MEADOWS v. BEAMSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017