Fullerton v. Hill
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Graham District Court. The material facts are stated in the opinion herein, filed April 9, 1892.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
This action was brought by the plaintiffs, as plaintiffs in the court below, upon a promissory note executed to them by A. L. Dunnwoody and Mary J. Dunnwoody, and indorsed by the defendant, W. R. Hill. The action was also for the foreclosure of a real-estate mortgage, given by A. L. Dunnwoody and wife to secure in part said note. Hill answered, and alleged that at t'he time he indorsed the note he did so only upon the special agreement with the plaintiffs and the other defendants that, if he would indorse the note, they would, when od e-half the amount of said note was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doolittle v. FerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Fuller v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Sarbach v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Talley v. BurtisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Janes v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Kline v. Bank of TescottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Atkinson v. BennetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Benham v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Weagant v. CamdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913