Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp. v. Susan Schein Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 10, 2003No. 1011496 and 1011497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

DaimlerChrysler Motors Corporation (“DaimlerChrysler”) and Thomas Acheson each appeal from a trial court’s order awarding attorney fees to the plaintiff, Susan Schein Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Inc. (“Schein”), under § 8-20-11, Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act, § 8-20-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”). The appeals were consolidated.

In October 2000, DaimlerChrysler gave written notice to Schein, “pursuant to Alabama Code § 8-20-4,” informing Schein of its intent to establish a Dodge automobile dealership in Hoover, Alabama; Acheson was the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Indianapolis Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Baldwin County v. PALMTREE PENTHOUSESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GPI AL-N, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
  2. Tuscaloosa Hyundai Inc v. Hyundai Motor America IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API