Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2003No. Docket 122367PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals held that the circuit court had authority to resentence defendant because the sentencing judge’s expectations regarding eligibility for parole had proved to be incorrect. We hold that the circuit judge properly concluded that he lacked jurisdiction to resentence, and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

i

Following a bench trial, defendant was found guilty of second-degree murder 1 and possession of a firearm during commission of a felony. 2 On September 22, 1981, the circuit court sentenced defendant to life in prison for murder, consecutive to the two-year…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SierbMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. WhalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re Dana JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. WatermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People of Michigan v. George Alan RowserMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. People of Michigan v. Michael Jeffrey JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API