Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Fisler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 11, 1943PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We are in accord with the conclusion of the learned Vice-Ordinary that Barnard Lorence, the adopted child of the testatrix’ great grandniece, Alice Keeler Lorence, is not entitled under the will to share in the trust corpus in substitution for his mother as her “lawful issue.” The opinion in this behalf is well-reasoned and altogether sufficient.

While ever controlled by the context, the word “issue” signifies, prima facie, “heirs of the body;” and the statute ordains that an adopted child “shall not be capable of taking-property expressly…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bottomley v. BottomleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. Case v. RoeblingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. In Re Estate of GriswoldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. In Re BurnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. In re the Trust for the Benefit of DukeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API