Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Angaline L. (In re Interest of Mercedes L.)

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2019No. Nos. A-17-1281 through A-17-1286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentPirtle, Judge

Assuming, for purposes of discussion, that the majority is correct in concluding that the orders appealed from, dated November 13, 2017, were "final, appealable order[s]" as is needed for us to acquire jurisdiction over these appeals, then to that extent, I agree with the analysis of the remaining issues and the result reached by the majority opinion.

However, I believe there is a very serious question under our existing case law and the facts herein whether the November 13, 2017, orders were final orders which affected a substantial right of Angaline. These appeals are somewhat unique because…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Interest of Octavio B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re Guardianship of Sophia M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re Interest of Jassenia H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. SchiesserNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Anderson v. FinkleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Interest of Brittney Sue P.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Parental Rights to: D.J.S.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API