Legal Opinion
(PS) Miner v. US Department of Housing
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 30, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01623Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MADIHA MINER No. 2:19-cv-1623-MCE-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ORDER 13 v. 14 US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action, filed an 18 amended complaint, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 6.) 19 A federal court has an independent duty to assess whether federal subject matter 20 jurisdiction exists, whether or not the parties raise the issue. See…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Thomas L. Apple v. John Glenn, U.S. SenatorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.