Legal Opinion

Meuser v. Kirschbaum

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motiost for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage the plaintiff demands judgment for any deficiency that may result against the defendants Charles H. Potter and Bay V. Kirschbaum. The defendant Potter has demurred to the complaint on the ground that the facts set forth do not constitute a cause of action against him, and the plaintiff has moved for judgment on the pleadings and for an order of reference to compute the amount due to the plaintiff. The facts alleged, briefly stated, are that Potter on the 9th day of July, 1906, gave his bond, payable on the 9th day of July, 1911, and also gave the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Murray v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Spencer v. . SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Union Bank v. RubensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alropa Corp. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API