Legal Opinion
State v. Ibey
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 4, 1976No. 94-74PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
The defendant was tried by court and convicted of knowingly and unlawfully possessing a regulated drug, marijuana, in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4224(a). Before trial, a motion to suppress was heard by a district judge other than the judge hearing the case on the merits. Findings of fact were made and the motion denied. Thereafter, the defendant’s attorney filed a motion for trial by court, signed only by him and not by defendant Ibey.
The appeal to this Court raises two issues. The first issue challenges the denial of the motion to suppress by claiming the facts before the hearing judge do not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. PlattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. MountfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. ConnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. CoitaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.