Legal Opinion

Canadian Typograph Co. v. Macgurn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Replevin by the Canadian Typograph Company, Limited, against Foster Macgurn. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant, a retailer, bought bicycles from the plaintiff, under a contract which reserved the title in the plaintiff until paid for; and the wheel in question in this action was bought by the defendant subject to the terms of such agreement, and was in the possession of the defendant when replevied. The plaintiff rendered a statement of account to the defendant. It afterwards began an action in assumpsit in a Canadian court, based upon said account, including this bicycle. The summons was served in Detroit, and there was no service in Canada. We infer that the defendant did not appear,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fuller v. ByrneMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ratchford v. Cayuga County Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Mitchell v. CastlenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Ratchford v. Cayuga County Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. W. W. Bierce Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bolinger v. National Cash Register Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API