Legal Opinion

State v. Prestwich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1989No. 18045Published

1Opinion of the Court

783 P.2d 298 (1989)

116 Idaho 959

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Keith PRESTWICH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18045.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

November 14, 1989.

Denman & Reeves, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant. Reginald Reeves, argued.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued, for plaintiff-respondent.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a marijuana growing case that has been the subject of two prior opinions of the Court of Appeals. In Prestwich I (State v. Prestwich, 110 Idaho 966, 719 P.2d 1226 (Ct.App. 1986)) the Court of Appeals held that the search warrant pursuant to…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Bakes; Concurrence · Bistline; Concurrence · Boyle; Concurrence · Bistline.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API