State v. Prestwich
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
783 P.2d 298 (1989)
116 Idaho 959
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Keith PRESTWICH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18045.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
November 14, 1989.
Denman & Reeves, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant. Reginald Reeves, argued.
Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued, for plaintiff-respondent.
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a marijuana growing case that has been the subject of two prior opinions of the Court of Appeals. In Prestwich I (State v. Prestwich, 110 Idaho 966, 719 P.2d 1226 (Ct.App. 1986)) the Court of Appeals held that the search warrant pursuant to…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Bakes; Concurrence · Bistline; Concurrence · Boyle; Concurrence · Bistline.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.