United States v. Earl Kabeiseman, Director of Revenue, State of Wyoming Wyoming Department of Revenue and Taxation State of Wyoming
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This case has its roots in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). In McCulloch, the Supreme Court held that under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, clause 2, a law passed by the state legislature of Maryland imposing a tax on a branch of the Bank of the United States located in Maryland was “unconstitutional and void.” In so doing, Chief Justice Marshall observed that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy.” Id. at 431.
In the instant case, we are concerned with the effort of the State of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Carolina v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Janette LohmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. LohmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996