Legal Opinion
United States v. Lester Irving Crandall
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 17, 1972No. 71-1212PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
In spite of able argument by defendant’s counsel we consider this appeal to be lacking in merit. Defendant’s motion for acquittal was denied, and thereafter he was found guilty of making a false statement, to wit, of supplying a false name, address, and date of birth in connection with his acquisition of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(a) (6). Following a denial of two motions for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, he appeals.
Defendant’s primary contention is that the misrepresentation was not one of a “fact material to the lawfulness of the sale,” 1 because,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Milton SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Lawrence W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- James Cody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Marilyn Jean BuckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Matte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- United States v. Jerry J. GudgerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.