Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kelley's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1993No. LD-90-023PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

On September 17,1990, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition to publicly censure the respondents, Edgar L. Kelley and Philip H. Cahalin for charging a clearly excessive fee, N.H. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a), maintaining representation that presented a conflict of interests, id. 1.7(b), and violating the Rules of Professional Conduct, id. 8.4(a). The petition and the respondents’ answers were referred to a Judicial Referee (Bean, J.) for a hearing. The referee determined that the respondents violated each of the rules. We agree that the respondents…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. NuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Drucker's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Adkin Plumbing & Heating Supply Co. v. HarwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Myers v. Virginia State Bar, ex rel. Second District CommitteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Kalled's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Evans & Luptak, PLC v. LizzaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pearson v. First NH Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Wood's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Coffey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Shillen's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API