Witherington v. Ware
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. March 12, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The plaintiff’s petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to him in the sum of thirty-five dollars, besides interest, on a note. The note was fully described in the petition, and it was further alleged: “Said note is now lost. A copy of which is hereto attached, as near as possible.” There was no demurrer at the appearance term, and the execution of a substantially similar note was admitted in one of the paragraphs of the answer. Held: Though the petition might have been subject to a timely demurrer, still the action could not properly be dismissed on oral motion, and the court erred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonackey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Social Benevolent Society, No. 1 v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Lynah v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Continental Fertilizer Co. v. PassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Duvall v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Trice v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924