Legal Opinion

Witherington v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1916No. 6494PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Dublin — Judge Hicks. March 12, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

The plaintiff’s petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to him in the sum of thirty-five dollars, besides interest, on a note. The note was fully described in the petition, and it was further alleged: “Said note is now lost. A copy of which is hereto attached, as near as possible.” There was no demurrer at the appearance term, and the execution of a substantially similar note was admitted in one of the paragraphs of the answer. Held: Though the petition might have been subject to a timely demurrer, still the action could not properly be dismissed on oral motion, and the court erred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gonackey v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Social Benevolent Society, No. 1 v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Lynah v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Continental Fertilizer Co. v. PassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Duvall v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Trice v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API