Charles F. Smithers' Appeal From Probate
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The parties have stipulated to the-material facts involved in this appeal and it is unnecessary to repeat them in any detail. It suffices to-note that the appellee is the widower of Marie D. Curtis who, in the language of the brief for the-appellants, “during the last year of her life, and presumably prior thereto ... supported the appellee,. John Jacob Curtis, and herself with a lavish hand”; the appellee elected to take his statutory share in his deceased wife’s estate, pursuant to the provisions-of § 7309 of the General Statutes (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1955, i) 3002d). Subsequently, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Bankers Trust Co. v. GreimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Connelly v. Waterbury National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Havens Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.