Legal Opinion

Charles F. Smithers' Appeal From Probate

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 24, 1956No. File 95501Published

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

The parties have stipulated to the-material facts involved in this appeal and it is unnecessary to repeat them in any detail. It suffices to-note that the appellee is the widower of Marie D. Curtis who, in the language of the brief for the-appellants, “during the last year of her life, and presumably prior thereto ... supported the appellee,. John Jacob Curtis, and herself with a lavish hand”; the appellee elected to take his statutory share in his deceased wife’s estate, pursuant to the provisions-of § 7309 of the General Statutes (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1955, i) 3002d). Subsequently, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. GreimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Connelly v. Waterbury National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Havens Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API