Legal Opinion
Ezeb v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 2010No. 2009-CA-0821PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
|! This appeal arises from damages the plaintiff allegedly suffered as a result of taking Clozaril. The manufacturer of Clo-zaril filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the plaintiffs claims regarding the alleged failure to provide an adequate warning. The trial court granted the motion and denied a motion for reconsideration or new trial. We do not find that the trial court erred, as the plaintiff will be unable to meet his burden of proof at trial. Therefore, no genuine issues of material fact exist and we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
W…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Prado v. Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts, AGLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Jack v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Grant v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ezeb v. Sandoz PharmaceuticalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010