Smith v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMehakfy, J.
These suits were brought, one by Maude Byan against the appellant and the other by Emma Florslioim against- the appellant, to recover on two promissory notes. The suits were brought separately but were consolidated and tried together.
The appellant, who was defendant in each suit below, answered, alleging that there was no consideration for the note other than an agreement to prevent or stop certain prosecutions against E. V. Oglesby, one of the makers of each note. That is, that the notes were executed in consideration of the fact that plaintiffs would dismiss or cause to be dismissed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bertig Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Johnson v. AnkrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Johnson v. AylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Horn v. BrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Cheney v. Auto Fedan Hay Press Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Poff v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- McDonald v. the Olla State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Connell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Williams v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1960
- In re CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.