Legal Opinion

TriMas Corporation v. William Meyers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2014No. 12-2420UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

In May of 2009, William E. Meyers— then 76 years of age — received notice that his retirement benefits would no longer be paid to him. This case is one of several litigated over the past five years in which Mr. Meyers — now 81 years of age — has been forced to wade through a web of corporate entities and financial transactions seeking to determine who is responsible for paying his retirement benefits. All deny that responsibility.

Meyers served as an executive for TriMas Corporation from 1987 until he retired at age 65 in 1998. He received benefits under a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawn Alexander v. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Mario Tenorio v. Osaka 88, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
  3. Montie v. Crossfire, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API