Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cain

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 10, 1968No. 55-68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The petitioner, as commissioner and chairman of the Burlington Housing Authority, was removed by the mayor. The grounds given were inefficiency and neglect of duty. Since there was no statutory provision for appeal, the petitioner brought to this Court his application for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of the legality of the removal proceedings. They were conducted under the authority of 24 V.S.A. §4006, which reads as follows:

For inefficiency or neglect of duty or misconduct in office, a commissioner of an authority may be removed by the mayor (or in the case of an authority of a town,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutter v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  2. Davidson v. WhitehillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Boutwell v. Champlain Realty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Burton v. Selectmen, Town of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  5. Jackvony v. BerardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Mayor of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  2. Brewster v. MAYOR OF CITY OF RUTLANDSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Town of Essex v. BushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API